Wednesday, December 17, 2014

Top Google Doodles Of 2014: World Cup & Winter Olympics Logos Lead The List

Google Year in search 2014

The Google Doodle team was busy this year.

By my count, the artist, illustrators and designers who create the Google logos celebrating notable events and personalities posted more than 100 Doodles in 2014. (The World Cup held reign for a full month on Google's homepage, with more than 60 Doodles to mark the soccer tournament from its first match on June 12 through the finals on July 13.)

Not only did the team make outstanding efforts to cover numerous events, Google paid special attention to the previous gap between its number of male-focused and female-focused logos.

After female advocacy group SPARK revealed only 77 women were represented in 445 Google Doodles between 2010 and 2013, Google made a concentrated effort this year to represent both genders equally. By February 1, Google had featured author Zora Neale Hurston, Dian Fossey and Harriet Tubman.

As part of its 2014 Year in Review, Google curated the following list of the top ten trending Doodles in 2014 that included a healthy mix of events, people and holidays.

1. World Cup 2014 #27 (Boss)

World Cup 2014 #27

2. 2014 Winter Olympics

Google doodle winter olympics 2014

3. Rubik's Cube

Rubiks Cube Google logo 2014

4. Philae Robotic Lander

philae-robotic-lander-lands-on-comet-67pchuryumovgerasimenko-5668009628663808-hp

5. Nelson Mandela

google-nelson-mandela-logo

6. International Women's Day 2014

7. Audrey Hepburn

Audrey Hepburn 85th Birthday google logo

8. Berlin Wall

9. Leo Tolstoy

Google logo Leo Tolstoy

10. Halloween 2014

Halloween witch Google logo 2014

Halloween ghost 2014 Google logo

Halloween scarecrow 2014 Google logo

Register Now & Save! Search Engine Land's SMX West search marketing show is already the event that more than pays for itself through practical tips & techniques you'll learn. But earn even more by booking now with Super Early Bird rates before they expire! See the agenda & learn more about the show.

About The Author

Amy Gesenhues is Third Door Media's General Assignment Reporter, covering the latest news and updates for Search Engine Land and Marketing Land. From 2009 to 2012, she was an award-winning syndicated columnist for a number of daily newspapers from New York to Texas. With more than ten years of marketing management experience, she has contributed to a variety of traditional and online publications, including MarketingProfs.com, SoftwareCEO.com, and Sales and Marketing Management Magazine. Read more of Amy's articles.

(Some images used under license from Shutterstock.com.)

Get the best search news, tips and resources, delivered each day.

Tuesday, December 16, 2014

Google’s Shutdown of Spanish News Service Watched Elsewhere in Europe

  • Autos

    This Car Collection Is Truly One of a Kind

  • U.S. News

    Hotel Groups Sue Los Angeles Over Minimum Wage Law

  • A-hed

    London Fund Manager Pays Steep Price for Dodging Train Fare

  • Burning Question

    Achoo! How You Should Blow Your Nose

  • U.S. News

    Cow Economy Faces a Pinch

  • Bonds

    Time to Spread Holiday Cheer, Even When You're Down

  • Business

    NBC to Live Stream Its Network

  • Tech

    PLAY

    Tech Toys To Make Kids Smarter

  • Monday, December 15, 2014

    Google faces $18 million fine for web privacy violations - Dutch watchdog

    AMSTERDAM Mon Dec 15, 2014 10:30pm IST

    A Google search page is reflected in sunglasses in this photo illustration taken in Brussels May 30, 2014. REUTERS/Francois Lenoir/Files

    A Google search page is reflected in sunglasses in this photo illustration taken in Brussels May 30, 2014.

    Credit: Reuters/Francois Lenoir/Files

    Our top entertainment pictures of 2014.  Pics 

    AMSTERDAM (Reuters) - Google could be fined up 15 million euros ($18.6 million) if it does not stop violating the privacy of Internet users in the Netherlands, the Dutch data protection agency said on Monday.

    The U.S. company is breaching the country's data protection act by using people's private information such as browsing history and location data to target them with customised ads, the Data Protection Authority (DPA) said.

    The regulator gave Google until the end of February to change how it handles the data it collects from individual web users.

    The company's handling of user data under its new privacy guidelines, introduced in 2012, has also been under investigation in five other European countries - France, Germany, Britain, Italy and Spain.

    "This has been ongoing since 2012 and we hope our patience will no longer be tested," said Jacob Kohnstamm, chairman of the Dutch DPA.

    Google combines data from search engine queries, emails, third-party websites tracking or "cookies", location data and video browsing to customise advertising.

    "This combining occurs without Google adequately informing the users in advance and without the company asking for consent. This is in breach of the law," the DPA said.

    It ordered the company to stop the violations or face incremental fines up to a maximum of 15 million euros. It said Google must start informing users of its actions and seeking their consent.

    A Google spokesman could not be immediately reached for comment.

    ($1 = 0.8051 euros)

    (Reporting By Anthony Deutsch; Editing by Pravin Char)

    Sunday, December 14, 2014

    If Google News Is Worth $100 Million Then Why Can't Google Pay The Newspaper Publishers?

    There seems to be a little misunderstanding of the lessons to be drawn from the mess Spain has made over Google News. That legislative decision that I described as being " an example of purblind incompetence in the making of public policy" in these pages. There's also the fact that Google does indeed produce Google News around the world without taking advertising on it but the fact that it produces it must mean there is some benefit to doing so even in the absence of such a direct revenue stream. Given this shouldn't Google therefore be sharing some of that value with the newspaper publishers, as the Spanish are demanding? The answer is no, almost certainly not and there's an intriguing guide to why not in what happens over at Yahoo News.

    First that misunderstanding about the lesson of the Spanish experience:

    But it's at least possible that Spain's decision could be a turning point, showing publishers throughout Europe that it's possible to demand that Google pay for content.

    Umm, no, it's not. It's entirely possible to get the law changed, as happened variously (and slightly differently) in France, Belgium and Germany, so that it is possible to demand, if you the copyright owner so desire, money from Google for content. It's also possible to get the law changed, as in Spain, so that you the copyright owner must demand money from Google for content. But it's not possible, in that stronger sense, to demand that Google pay for content. Because if you do so demand then Google will simply close down the services and tell you to "get on yer bike". As it has done in Spain. And as it did in the other countries by simply stating that if you wanted payment then you wouldn't be included in the index.

    But there's another point being raised now too. Which is that Google must actually be making something or other out of Google News otherwise it wouldn't be doing it. And it's amusing that it's Marissa Mayer, during her time at Google, who gave some indication as to what it is that Google does get of value from it:

    On Friday afternoon, I spoke to Angela Mills-Wade, the Executive Director of the European Publishers Council, about Google News's announcement. She called Gingras's assertion that Google News makes no money on the service "astonishing," pointing to a speech that Marissa Mayer, then vice president at Google, gave in 2008, at the Fortune Brainstorm Tech conference, where Mayer said, according to Fortune's write-up, that Google News was worth about $100 million to the company. And that was 6 years ago. Mills-Wade told me that Google News should have been a partner to the news industry, considering the position they've established in the market. "But," she said, "partnerships are built on trust by two willing parties with some common understanding and a balance of bargaining power based on mutual interest. Whereas given their status of de facto gateway to the Internet, they hold all the keys, and offer only a take-it-or-leave-it choice of whether you come in and play their game or not. If you do so, it is on their terms. So there is no trust and no hope of true partnerships or fair and open competition."

    Old numbers, yes, and that Fortune piece is here:

    Google News is free and has zero ads. So what's it worth to Google? About $100 million.

    That's the figure Google vice president Marissa Mayer, who heads search products and user experience, threw out during a Tuesday lunch session at Fortune's Brainstorm Tech conference in Half Moon Bay, Calif. How does she put a value on a product that doesn't directly make money? The online giant figures that Google News funnels readers over to the main Google search engine, where they do searches that do produce ads. And that's a nice business. Think of Google News as a $100 million search referral machine.

    That's certainly nice money. But look at what it's actually saying. Google News makes money for Google as a search referral site to other parts of Google. Excellent, that's just fine. But given what is being aggregated in Google News clearly and obviously by far the largest portion of traffic is going to be referrals to those news sites. All of which have their own ads on their own pages and thus they profit from the traffic that Google News sends them.

    And we can actually take this a stage further. I have no idea what the relationship between Forbes and any of these services is but I did some work a couple of years back for Seeking Alpha. And that site recently sent me information stating that they were no longer going to submit stories for inclusion in Yahoo News. For that site charges for referral traffic to news stories. Seeking Alpha thought they could do better without such charges and I'm not going to try and gainsay their commercial decisions. However, do note what this means. That at least some news sites think that referral traffic from news aggregation sites is sufficiently valuable to actually cough up real money for it. Traffic that Google News sends them absolutely for free. And people are complaining about Google for this?

    Slightly boggles the mind really, doesn't it? Except it doesn't when you consider the reactions of those newspaper publishers in France, Belgium and Germany. Sure, they got the law changed so that it was possible for them to charge Google for use of the content. Google said on yer bike, we'll not pay. If you insist on payment then we'll just not include you. At which point everyone said, well, we'd rather be included than try to charge. Meaning, obviously, that the free referral traffic was worth more to them than the fees they weren't going to get from Google.

    At which point we really should have laid bare the ridiculousness of those European policies upon this. Just to repeat this, some news aggregation sites (Yahoo News being the one I know about) charge the recipients of referral traffic for it. Google sends it for free. When offered the choice between free traffic and no traffic publishers have, by their actions, made it very clear that they prefer the traffic. And yet we've still got people running around insisting that Google must in some form pay the publishers when the publishers are already profiting from the current arrangement? To a far larger extent we might assume than Google itself is?

    This is just nonsensical, isn't it? Especially when we have that Spanish example, that making it impossible not to charge Google for the traffic simply ensures that there will be no more of that free and profitable traffic?

    My latest book is "23 Things We Are Telling You About Capitalism" At Amazon or Amazon UK. A critical (highly critical) re-appraisal of Ha Joon Chang's "23 Things They Don't Tell You About Capitalism".

    Saturday, December 13, 2014

    Google to shift engineers out of Russia

    Search engine giant Google has confirmed that it has decided to shut down its engineering offices in Russia and will be moving its engineers out of Russia soon.

    A Google spokesperson confirmed that the decision taken by the Russian government to tighten Internet regulations has affected the functioning of the tech firms and it has forced the Mountain View-based firm to close its engineering offices in Russia.

    As per the recent regulations of Russian government, the overseas tech companies doing business in the country are required to store users' personal data exclusively on data centers within the country rather than in data centers across the world; thereby underscoring increasingly restrictive laws with regard to Internet freedom. The Internet firms which do not comply with the new regulations could face penalties.

    The new rules are scheduled to take effect in 2015. Since Google wants to increase is business investment in Russia next year, a Google representative said: "We are deeply committed to our Russian users and customers and we have a dedicated team in Russia, working to support them."

    Friday, December 12, 2014

    SEO: Google Makes Penguin Algorithm More Slippery

    Diagnosing a site's Google ranking penalties just became more difficult. Penguin, Google's link-spam-fighting algorithm, will now be continuously optimized instead of semi-regular with announced update releases.

    The buzz around Google's Penguin algorithm has been high since mid-October when version 3.0 began rolling out after more than a year without an update. Two months later, Penguin is still rolling out. Typically the update takes several days to complete, after which marketers work to determine if their sites were affected and what to do next.

    The abnormal behavior of this update has been puzzling, until Google's admission to industry publication Search Engine Land this week that it has switched its Penguin algorithm updates to a continuous optimization process. This switch from scheduled updates to ongoing optimization signals that Google is confident in the algorithm's ability to combat spammy search results.

    For ecommerce sites, however, the change makes it more challenging to identify the source of organic search traffic decreases. When performance suddenly decreases, one of the first things a search-engine-optimization professional checks for is whether an algorithm update was announced in the same timeframe. Without specific release dates and announcements, those easily identifiable milestones no longer exist.

    What Is the Penguin Algorithm?

    First introduced in April 2012, Google's Penguin algorithm focuses on removing sites from search results that have improved their performance artificially with low-quality links. Because Google's ranking algorithms factor in the quantity and quality of links, sites have been finding ways for years to artificially increase the number of links pointing to their sites by buying, exchanging, or engaging in other forms of easy link acquisition.

    Google has worked to remove the benefit of these easy methods of link acquisition based on the desire to reward only naturally earned links that have been made based on a site's quality and value to its visitors. One by one, tactics formerly deemed acceptable — like directory submissions, article marketing, and press release optimization — have been abused and devalued.

    Penguin is the identifiable algorithm that Google uses to algorithmically devalue links that appear to be artificially acquired. Because it's an algorithm, no subjective human review is involved. As such, it's important to understand the things that usually lead to Penguin-based organic search performance decreases.

    Sites with large quantities of low-quality links and unusually high numbers of highly optimized anchor text run a higher risk of tripping the Penguin filter. For example, the more of these elements found in a site's link profile, the more likely they are to be penalized:

    • High percentage of links from low quality sites;
    • High percentage of links from off-topic sites;
    • High percentage of keyword-optimized anchor text;
    • High percentage of blog roll and other run-of-site links where the link is found on every page of the site.

    If you happen to have gotten a great text link with great anchor text from a star blogger in your industry, you won't automatically draw Penguin's wrath. The algorithm looks for a combination of these and other signals that, when taken together, are too optimized or too easily acquired to be true.

    How to Diagnose Penguin Issues Now

    Now that Penguin is flying under the radar along with the vast majority of the algorithm updates Google and the other search engines release, we have to change the way we identify its effects.

    • Rule out other issues. Use tools like the Panguin Tool and MozCast to identify other major algorithmic milestones. If industry experts are able to identify and label future major blips in Penguin activity, these tools will incorporate them as well. Don't forget to look at your own site. Changes in a site's technical, platform, and architectural configuration can have the same impact as a major algorithm update.
    • Check Google Webmaster Tools. If your site is suffering from a manual penalty delivered by one of Google's human reviewers, Google Webmaster Tools will inform you and let you know which type of penalty to resolve.
    • Look for link spam. If you can't pinpoint another issue and you suspect Penguin is the culprit, analyze your link profile for signs of low-quality links. To learn more, see "SEO: How to Identify Low Quality Links." You'll need a link analysis tool to accomplish this. Google Webmaster Tools is a great place to start, and other tools like SearchMetrics, Moz, and Majestic will help expand your research.

    The two remedies for Penguin penalties are link removal and link disavowal. Removal involves contacting the sites linking to you and requesting that they remove their links. If you have a paid relationship with these sites, that may be easy. Typically it's more of a manual process finding and emailing the owner of each individual site.

    Google also allows you to report links that you don't trust, essentially telling Google that the link is not one you want to be associated with. The Disavow Tool on Google Webmaster Tools makes the process fairly straightforward, but be aware that the tool merely makes a request of Google rather than a command. If you haven't made an effort to have links removed first, as indicated by the absence of some of the poor links that used to point to your site, Google may ignore your disavowal request.

    Both removal and disavowal require that you first identify the links that are negatively impacting your link profile. The aforementioned article "SEO: How to Identify Low Quality Links" includes a downloadable Excel file to help you analyze the domains linking to your site and determine which to action first.

    At the end of the day, though, the only thing that can resolve a Penguin algorithm issue is the very thing you need to improve your SEO to start with: Earn more links from more high-value sites. Yes, this is much easier said than done. But as the search engines devise stronger algorithms to sniff out and devalue artificial techniques for boosting rankings, it's the only way to truly increase your site's long-term authority.

    Wednesday, December 10, 2014

    Google Says Penguin To Shift To “Continuous Updates”

    penguins-diving-ss-1920

    A Google spokesperson has told us that they will now be updating the Penguin algorithm continuously, by optimizing it as they go. A Google spokesperson sent us the following statement around our recent questions about the holiday Penguin updates.

    That last big update is still rolling out — though really there won't be a particularly distinct end-point to the activity, since Penguin is shifting to more continuous updates. The idea is to keep optimizing as we go now.

    That definitely explains all the reports of Penguin changes we've been recently been seeing. Which also means that we will likely be covering these updates, even if they are not confirmed by Google, when we feel the change is significant enough to warrant so. If we feel one of these "continuous updates" has resulted in enough of a significant spike in the search results, we will label it as a Penguin update within the 3.x category.

    Penguin algorithm updates have historically been processed offline and pushed at a specific point in time. Google would process all the Penguin data offline and then pushed the data live, which would produced change in the search results. Now, Google seems to be saying they will change the algorithm within their live ranking processes.

    Live changes to the Penguin algorithm seems to imply no more large data pushes for Penguin.

    We will continue to document what we feel are changes to the live Penguin algorithm.

    But what this means for sites who were impacted by any of these live changes is unclear. Do their link removal or disavow efforts get processed between each live algorithm change or would that not happen until Penguin 4.0? Again, we are working on getting clearer information from Google around these changes.

    Also, why Google feels okay with changing these things now, during the holiday season, is still a bit worrisome for many. On the other hand, we wanted Google to update the Penguin algorithm faster, and it seems like Google is now.

    Just to keep you all up to date, we have not seen any changes in Penguin since this Saturday, December 6, 2014:

    • Penguin 1.0 on April 24, 2012 (impacting ~3.1% of queries)
    • Penguin 1.1 on May 26, 2012 (impacting less than 0.1%)
    • Penguin 1.2 on October 5, 2012 (impacting ~0.3% of queries)
    • Penguin 2.0 on May 22, 2013 (impacting 2.3% of queries)
    • Penguin 2.1 on Oct. 4, 2013 (impacting around 1% of queries)
    • Penguin 3.0 on October 17, 2014 (impacting around 1% of queries)
    • Penguin 3.1 on November 27, 2014 (confirmed by Google, no impact given, Google considers part of Penguin 3.0)
    • Penguin 3.2 on December 2, 2014 (not confirmed by Google but based on publisher reports)
    • Penguin 3.3 on December 5, 2014 (not confirmed by Google but based on publisher reports)
    • Penguin 3.4 on December 6, 2014 (not confirmed by Google but based on publisher reports)

    Register Now & Save! Search Engine Land's SMX West search marketing show is already the event that more than pays for itself through practical tips & techniques you'll learn. But earn even more by booking now with Super Early Bird rates before they expire! See the agenda & learn more about the show.


    (Some images used under license from Shutterstock.com.)

    Everything you need to know about SEO, delivered every Thursday.